Sunday, April 7, 2013

Box Office Breakdown: Audiences Dare to Check Out "Evil Dead"

As I expected, Evil Dead came out on top at the weekend box office with an impressive but not necessarily remarkable $26 million. The film had an incredible marketing campaign that almost dared audiences to check it out, and it seemed to have worked- for the film's opening night. But a C+ Cinemascore and declining grosses through the weekend seems to emphasize that audiences aren't crazy about the film. Still, with a $17 million budget this one should do solid business for Sony. It's the planned sequels they'll have to worry about. Though, if you read my review, you might see that it has the potential to be a cult classic, much like its original.

This week's other 'new' release is Jurassic Park 3D, which did much better than I expected with $18 million. 3D rereleases haven't performed very well as of late, and Jurassic Park's opening ranks relatively high amongst its peers- though it isn't exactly huge by any means. Still, it's almost impossible for these films to actually be flops, so I can't imagine Universal is too unhappy. As for whether or not the 3D rerelease trend will continue- I'm not sure, but I hope not.


As for holdovers, G.I. Joe: Retaliation and The Croods are actually tying for second and third place right now, and we'll only know for sure the order of these two films on the Top 10 once actuals are reported. Both films are performing well, however. Olympus Has Fallen also continues to impress, Temptation is showing solid legs and Oz continues to make some serious money for Disney and should officially break even next weekend. In the meantime, check below the jump for a preview of next week. And here is your Top 10-
  1. Evil Dead- $26 million (debut)
  2. G.I. Joe: Retaliation- $21.1 million ($86 million in 2 weeks)*
  3. The Croods- $21.1 million ($125 million in 3 weeks)*
  4. Jurassic Park 3D- $18 million (debut)
  5. Olympus Has Fallen- $10.04 million ($71 million in 3 weeks)
  6. Tyler Perry's Temptation: Confessions of a Marriage Counselor- $10 million ($38 million in 2 weeks)
  7. Oz the Great and Powerful- $8 million ($212 million in 5 weeks)
  8. The Host- $5 million ($19 million in 2 weeks)
  9. The Call- $3 million ($45 million in 4 weeks)
  10. Admission- $2 million ($15 million in 3 weeks)
* is used to symbolize the fact that the two films are tied for 2nd and 3rd place. Results will change when actuals are reported tomorrow.

Movie Review: "Evil Dead"


Evil Dead is not a film to go to if you're looking for a particularly strong script or riveting character development. This is a haunted house of a horror movie- a film that moves the audience from one terrifying scene to the next, slowly but noticeably increasing the intensity of the scares and the amount of gore on screen with each new sequence. It isn't groundbreaking, though it is certainly one of the better horror remakes to date. For those who are ready and willing to go along for the ride, it will be one hell of a good time.

The characters in most horror films, Evil Dead included, are essentially piles of meat waiting to be ripped to shreds. The audience bought their tickets with that idea in mind- when each character meets their ultimate doom, it really doesn't come as much of a surprise. A good screenplay's job is to make us care about the characters enough so that when they do die, we feel something. And Evil Dead does that well. Instead of boring us with the obligatory "calm before the storm", screenwriter Rodo Sayagues (with polishes by Diablo Cody) actually gives us a reason to get invested.

The character at the center, Mia, is trying to quit a heroin addiction and is spending a weekend at a cabin with her friends as she undergoes withdrawl. In the process of creating some relatively interesting characters, the screenplay also manages to provide reasoning for why the characters will make the the stupid decisions that angry viewers will yell at them about later on. They can't leave the cabin because last time Mia tried to beat her habit, she gave up after a few hours. Mia's increasingly terrified behavior isn't abnormal as her mother showed signs of insanity not long ago, not to mention she's undergoing withdrawal. And there is no need to drive out to the hospital as one of the characters is a nurse. Are these first twenty minutes or so particularly well written? Not necessarily, but they help to differentiate Evil Dead from the dozens of other horror remakes that never bothered to give us a reason to care for its characters, while also subtly acknowledging the clichés of horror without relying on meta commentary- something that wouldn't have worked well in this film.

Eventually, as I'm sure most of the audience is expecting, the characters are subjected to a particularly sadistic breed of demon who begins picking the characters off one by one, disposing of them in increasingly disgusting manners.  At this point the plot is largely forgotten, but that's ok. This film becomes pure entertainment at about the 30 minute mark, and remains that way for a full hour, not once coming to a halt but instead creating a false sense of calm for a few minutes at a time. And, like all great haunted houses, the scares- or, in this case, the gore- get ratcheted up with each passing sequence. From a shard of glass to an electric knife and ending in, naturally, a chainsaw, Evil Dead encourages, no, insists that audiences embrace the film as nothing more than bloody entertainment. And, for the most part, they succeed.

Now, naturally, audiences that don't like a lot of blood with their horror will not enjoy this extremely violent film, but the film simply was not made for them. But as an exercise in trying to gross the audience out, it really succeeds. Director Fede Alvarez proves one scene after another that he knows how to stage an exciting and terrifying confrontation between our heroes and the demonic antagonists, without ever feeling like he's resorting to clichés or even relying on famous sequences from the horror classic of which it's based. It's the sort of horror film that will have viewers wanting badly to cover their eyes in fear but being too enamored to turn away. And while he certainly relies on gore to elicit scares, the real tension comes from figuring out where the gore will come from and what will produce it. Who will bite the dust next? What will happen to them? And with what weapon will the damage be done? Gorehounds will certainly go home happy- this is quite possibly the most violent mainstream horror film to date. It also happens to be one of the most creatively violent films in recent memory.

But in this gore lies one of my biggest problems with the film itself. I'm far from squeamish and love horror films of all sorts, but I do believe there is a fine line between effective gore and gratuitous, borderline offensive gore. That's my problem with "torture porn"- I take no pleasure in watching a film where we are simply introduced to characters simply to watch them get tortured. Not to mention that some violence should be almost off limit for directors of the genre. Sure, watching characters lop off body parts with kitchen appliances is brutal. But is it offensive? Not necessarily. Rape, however, is something I believe to always be unnecessary. There is, quite simply, no way to make it "fun" in any context. That was my biggest problem with Raimi's original.  Obviously "tree rape" is far from the actual act, but the idea behind it still rubbed me the wrong way. For the most part, the violence in Evil Dead didn't bother me, but there was on scene that came close to crossing the line. I won't get into specifics for those who don't want to be spoiled, but it was one of the earlier violent scenes and it definitely created a poor first impression. But, while I don't think it came as close to crossing the ethical line as the first one did, it certainly did bother me a little bit.

But that's not to suggest that this is a bad film. In terms of the horror genre, this is miles beyond many of the recent offerings and it stands tall in terms of horror remakes. It also serves as a great introduction to two talents I'll be looking out for at the movies- the aforementioned director Fede Alvarez and the film's star, Jane Levy. Her character is put through the wringer and forced to run a gauntlet of emotions, and she is constantly up to the task. I certainly believe she has a long career ahead of her. In a year devoid of entertaining films, let alone quality cinema, Evil Dead demands a trip to the theater- for those with the stomachs to handle it. Flaws and all, it's bloody good fun.

OVERALL GRADE: B
_____________________

Follow me on Twitter
Follow me on Tumblr
Follow me on Letterboxd

Five Films I'd Like to See Back in 3D


I love Jurassic Park. When it come to blockbuster entertainment, you can't get much better. It is a legitimately well made, suspenseful action film with special effects that hold up surprisingly well. But, when it was announced that the film was going to be transferred to 3D for a re-release, I was surprisingly unenthusiastic. It's not that I'm against 3D re-releases (although they are, obviously, unnecessary). It's just that Jurassic Park is a film that can not benefit from 3D in anyway, and there are so many other classic movies that could really benefit from a transfer to 3D. So, I compiled this list of film that I'd love to check out on the big screen again, especially in 3D.

5.) Scott Pilgrim vs. the World (dir. Edgar Wright, 2010)

I tried to keep this list to films that aren't all that recent, but one of the first films to came to mind when I thought of films that could benefit from 3D was Edgar Wright's fantastic celebration of all things nerd, Scott Pilgrim vs. the World. With text literally popping out of thing air, giant computer-generated creatures, and so many outlandish moments that bringing it into the third dimension feels oddly natural. While the film certainly doesn't need the transfer, I feel like it would make the film even more entertaining than it already is, and add to the movie's considerably stylish visuals. 

4.) Spider-Man (dir. Sam Raimi, 2002)

Another one of my all time favorite blockbusters is Spider-Man, a film that had a considerable effect on me as a young movie nerd and made me realize how obsessed with film I really was. I always loved the swinging effects in the film, and thought I'd finally get my wish of experiencing the feeling of flying through the streets of New York with The Amazing Spider-Man last summer. And, in the end, I sort of got my wish... too bad the film was boring and not even close to the quality of Raimi's films. So, sure, maybe I want a 3D conversion purely to fulfill my childhood wish and see a great film at the same time. But, hey, this is my list and I figure I'd be honest. 

3.) Terminator 2: Judgement Day (dir. James Cameron, 1991)

Love him or hate him, James Cameron revolutionized 3D. Avatar remains one of the best uses of the technology to date, and completely changed the way the film community- and filmgoers in general- viewed 3D. I always figured he'd choose to release some of his older films in the format... but out of all his filmography, he chose Titanic? Financially it made sense, but it's just not a film that would benefit from the added dimension with the exception of one or two sequences. Now, Terminator 2 is a different story. Not only is it the best film Cameron has ever directed, but it's a special effects driven thrill ride that would become even more excited with everything flying out of the screen. It also helps that I absolutely adore this movie, and would run out to theaters to see it right away. 

2.) Moulin Rouge! (dir. Baz Luhrmann, 2001)

An unorthodox choice for sure, but Moulin Rouge! is one of the best looking films I've ever seen. Not only would the "beyond the window" moments (i.e., the things that fly out of the screen) look interesting, but it would add depth to the film that would make it's theatrical appearance even more pleasing. The elaborate sets would benefit from the "behind the window" visuals, and make the film feel even more like a musical you'd be witnessing on a stage- not a screen. Plus, with Luhrmann filming his next film, The Great Gatsby, in 3D it feels like the director's previous movies would work well in the format.

1.) The Matrix (dir. Andy & Lana Wachowski, 1999)

The Wachowskis revolutionized special effects in 1999 with bullet time, slow motion and the film's mind altering action scenes. At the time, 3D was almost nothing like what it is today- it was, merely, a gimmick saved for bad horror flicks and children's movies. And while it still may be a gimmick of sorts, films like Life of Pi and the aforementioned Avatar had terrific special effects that only further emphasized by 3D effects. The brilliant special effects in The Matrix would look incredible in 3D, and the film is already so over-the-top and stylized that making the transfer seems almost expected. In fact, I'm shocked it hasn't been done already. It is, by far, the film that I think would benefit the most from the technology. 

Friday, April 5, 2013

Our Top Story Tonight: The "Jane's Got a Gun" Saga Continues as Bradley Cooper Joins the Cast


It's Friday night, so I'm gonna keep this somewhat quick but there were a few interesting tidbits of film casting today. The most interesting, in my opinion, is that Bradley Cooper has joined the cast of the now notorious Jane's Got a Gun, the drama which Lynne Ramsay quit shockingly followed shortly by Jude Law. Cooper will fill Law's shoes as the film's villain, with Natalie Portman and Joel Edgerton as the leads. The film will now be directed by Gavin O'Connor and follows a woman who's husband is targeted by a gang, leading her to seek the help of a former lover to take them down.

As I've mentioned before, the film sounds interesting and the addition of Cooper makes me think this project could rebound from its tumultuous production. With three great actors in the cast and a director that I find quite talented, I'm much more optimistic then I once was about this film.

After the jump, check out news on Guilmero del Toro and David O. Russell's next project...


Thursday, April 4, 2013

Our Top Story Tonight: Ready For Prom? The "Carrie" Trailer Has Arrived


The trailer for the Carrie remake has arrived online after much anticipation this week. The film will find Chloe Moretz (Kick-Ass) filling in the shoes (or should we say prom dress?) of Sissy Spacek as the titular Carrie, an outcast teen that discovers she has telepathic abilities. Julianne Moore will be playing the role of Carrie's extremely religious (and psychotic) mother, who regularly abuses the teen. The film was originally to be released about two weeks ago but was pushed to October a few months ago. It is directed by Kimberly Peirce, making a pretty remarkable jump in terms of genres. Peirce is best known for her Oscar winning drama Boys Don't Cry, a film about the rape and murder of transgendered teen Brandon Teena. Carrie is set to be released on October 18.

Now, the original Carrie and the book of which it is based may be classics, but I was never all that fond of Brian de Palma's film. It may have been terrifying at the time, but it hasn't aged well at all and plays more like a campy classic than it does a horror film. That being said, Carrie is one of the few horror classics that I feel could actually benefit from a remake, especially with bullying getting much more national attention than it did back when the book was written and the original film was released. Yet, this trailer left me cold. Moretz, a talented actress, seems surprisingly miscast in these scenes and comes off as being far too young, and the whole film felt almost too similar to the original. Obviously I'll hold off on judgement until I see the final film, but I can't say I'm all that excited to check it out.

Check out more news after the jump-